<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perl: How did you get hooked?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://graeme.per.ly/perl-how-did-you-get-hooked/237/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://graeme.per.ly/perl-how-did-you-get-hooked/237</link>
	<description>Because Perl definitely isn&#039;t dead.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:16:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crb3</title>
		<link>http://graeme.per.ly/perl-how-did-you-get-hooked/237/comment-page-1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>crb3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graeme.per.ly/?p=237#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Universality, transparency, extensibility, dependability.

A decade plus ago, I was Windows-based and looking around for a
scripting language to &quot;wrap around&quot; a cross-assembler&#039;s failing build using Borland &#039;make&#039; and force it to work right. Having heard about Perl, I set up the BC-based 5.04.002 (the precursor to ActiveState), bought the Camel book and waded in, and soon had that complicated build working my way with single-point control of parameters. 

That was the start. From then on, I was more likely to begin a project in Perl, even if that was prototyping for eventual C or assembly code. Whatever I thought about doing (converting text-token streams into a MIDI file? watching for intruder hosts on my network? quick-and-dirty data-scooping CGI?), there was a straightforward way to do it in Perl. I got more done because Perl was just-high-enough to relieve me of the grunt-work stuff (like malloc-fiddling) while leaving me in charge of program design and composition. I migrated to Linux; Perl was there waiting for me, and working even better for not having to fight the OS. CPAN is as much an education as a resource, with library code I can read and recast when I have to minimize the memory-cost of module pull-in, or use as-is when time is more scarce than system resources. 

Perhaps that should be the sales message: the new languages are up-and-coming, but Perl5 is already *there*, a ready universal (How often do you see PHP run at the commandline? Ruby? How are they at GUI?) tool with solid foundations and ample auxiliary resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Universality, transparency, extensibility, dependability.</p>
<p>A decade plus ago, I was Windows-based and looking around for a<br />
scripting language to &#8220;wrap around&#8221; a cross-assembler&#8217;s failing build using Borland &#8216;make&#8217; and force it to work right. Having heard about Perl, I set up the BC-based 5.04.002 (the precursor to ActiveState), bought the Camel book and waded in, and soon had that complicated build working my way with single-point control of parameters. </p>
<p>That was the start. From then on, I was more likely to begin a project in Perl, even if that was prototyping for eventual C or assembly code. Whatever I thought about doing (converting text-token streams into a MIDI file? watching for intruder hosts on my network? quick-and-dirty data-scooping CGI?), there was a straightforward way to do it in Perl. I got more done because Perl was just-high-enough to relieve me of the grunt-work stuff (like malloc-fiddling) while leaving me in charge of program design and composition. I migrated to Linux; Perl was there waiting for me, and working even better for not having to fight the OS. CPAN is as much an education as a resource, with library code I can read and recast when I have to minimize the memory-cost of module pull-in, or use as-is when time is more scarce than system resources. </p>
<p>Perhaps that should be the sales message: the new languages are up-and-coming, but Perl5 is already *there*, a ready universal (How often do you see PHP run at the commandline? Ruby? How are they at GUI?) tool with solid foundations and ample auxiliary resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://graeme.per.ly/perl-how-did-you-get-hooked/237/comment-page-1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graeme.per.ly/?p=237#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Come to the darkside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come to the darkside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

